To project which NFL franchises are in the best shape for the next three seasons, we asked our panel of experts -- Louis Riddick, Mike Sando and Field Yates -- to rate each team's roster (excluding quarterback), quarterback, draft, front office and coaching using this scale:
100: A+ (Elite), 90: A (Great), 80: B (Very good), 70: C (Average), 60: D (Very bad), 50: F (Disastrous), 40: F- (The worst thing imaginable).
After averaging the results from the panelists, each of the five categories was weighted to create the overall score -- roster (30 percent), quarterback (20 percent), draft (15 percent), front office (15 percent) and coaching (20 percent). The result is a comprehensive ranking based on how well each team is positioned for the future.
Can the New England Patriots count on having a chance to win even more rings? How far will the Dallas Cowboys rise behind Dak Prescott and Ezekiel Elliott? And what about the Cleveland Browns, who had a dismal season but have some intriguing young pieces?
Read through the full file No. 1 through No. 32, or jump to your favorite team using the quick links below.
ARI | ATL | BAL | BUF | CAR | CHI | CIN | CLE | DAL | DEN | DET | GB | HOU | IND | JAC | KC | LAC | LAR | MIA | MIN | NE | NO | NYG | NYJ | OAK | PHI | PIT | SF | SEA | TB | TEN | WAS
1. New England Patriots
2016 record: 14-2 (won Super Bowl)
AFC East future rank: first
Why they're here: It's shortsighted to look past the remarkable career and acumen of Tom Brady. He's the best player on the planet. But the Patriots' No. 1 ranking here is also a reflection of their deep, talented roster. The nucleus of players signed through at least 2019 also includes: Rob Gronkowski, Devin McCourty, James White, Marcus Cannon, Stephon Gilmore, Julian Edelman, Dont'a Hightower and others. The pipeline is strong. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: There's no way to predict how much longer Brady will play at a high level, but the wall will come eventually. The other looming unknown: How much longer does Bill Belichick really want to coach? No matter how good QB Jimmy Garoppolo becomes or how qualified Belichick's replacement is, the eventual absence of Brady and Belichick will have a tremendous impact on this organization. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Patriots rank so high in most categories that it's tough to find areas where they might outperform projections, but if Brady really can remain a top QB into his mid-40s, as he has said he plans to do, then the No. 7 ranking in that department could be conservative. If Brady doesn't last that long, there's also a chance the team could refocus around Garoppolo and remain exceedingly well-positioned at that spot. -- Mike Sando
2. Seattle Seahawks
2016 record: 10-5-1 (lost in divisional round)
NFC West future rank: first
Why they're here: Does any team find more value in places that are otherwise not regarded as gold mines? The Seahawks build the depth of their roster through late-round picks -- as is the case around the league -- but also have found stars that are foundational pieces at discounted rates in free agency (Michael Bennett and Cliff Avril arrived on modest deals) and in the middle rounds of the draft (Russell Wilson, Richard Sherman, Kam Chancellor and more). -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: The Legion of Boom's reign is coming to an end, with Sherman and Earl Thomas both carrying $10 million-plus cap numbers in 2018, and Chancellor, the team leader, about to become an unrestricted free agent in 2018 at the age of 30. That Seattle drafted four defensive backs this past spring is further proof that change is coming. This unit has been the heart and soul of the Seahawks for the past five seasons; when the transition is complete, where will the team get its attitude and spark? -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Seahawks could realistically outperform their No. 9 ranking in roster outlook after selecting six players in the second and third rounds of the 2017 draft. No team in the common-draft era (since 1967) has selected more total players across those rounds in a single draft. Quantity does not necessarily equal quality, but the Seahawks did give themselves a chance to restock an already strong roster. -- Mike Sando
3. Atlanta Falcons
2016 record: 11-5 (lost in the Super Bowl)
NFC South future rank: first
Why they're here: Take your pick for Atlanta: The offensive nucleus consists of -- among others -- Matt Ryan, Julio Jones, Alex Mack and Ryan Schraeder, who are all under contract for the next three years. And on defense, that group includes Desmond Trufant, Deion Jones, Vic Beasley Jr. and Keanu Neal. This roster is loaded, top to bottom, with contributors at key positions who are still in their primes. The Falcons' success last season was no fluke and not bound to fade anytime soon. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Coaching-staff turnover, particularly at the coordinator positions, is what would be keeping me up at night, given how everything else is in place for this team to be a Super Bowl contender for the next three seasons. Defensive coordinator Marquand Manuel has never been a coordinator before at any level, and offensive coordinator Steve Sarkisian is taking over an offense that had developed a one-of-a-kind chemistry between playcaller (Kyle Shanahan) and QB over the past two seasons. That will not be easily duplicated. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Falcons ranked among the top seven in every category. As Louis mentioned, the coaching situation appears most vulnerable following widespread staff turnover this offseason, but if Sarkisian grows into a strong NFL offensive coordinator, Atlanta could swiftly solve one of its biggest looming questions following Shanahan's departure to the 49ers. -- Mike Sando
4. Green Bay Packers
2016 record: 10-6 (lost in the NFC Championship Game)
NFC North future rank: first
Why they're here: Not to simplify things too much, but with Aaron Rodgers under contract for three more seasons, Green Bay is almost a contender by default. That speaks to his surreal brilliance. And just for good measure, his highest cap number during that span is scheduled to be $21.1 million, a modest number for a franchise quarterback. That should enable Green Bay to continue to maintain a healthy cap situation. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Having drafted defensive backs with their first two selections in 2015 and 2017, the improved play of the secondary is a major point of emphasis for this team going forward. The Packers' pass defense allowed 58 passes of 20 yards or more (28th in the NFL) last season, and the lack of consistent availability/production they received from players such as CBs Damarious Randall and Quinten Rollins was a major reason why. That has to change if this team is going to contend with the NFC's high-powered passing offenses. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The potential looming retirement of general manager Ted Thompson explains why the Packers rank lower in front-office outlook (10th) than they rank in any other category. That is fair and could even be optimistic. But if this organization is as ready for Thompson's retirement as it was for Ron Wolf's much more abrupt departure in 2001, the outlook could improve. -- Mike Sando
5. Pittsburgh Steelers
2016 record: 11-5 (lost in the AFC Championship Game)
AFC North future rank: first
Why they're here: What has been an offensive juggernaut in recent seasons should be even better in 2017. Martavis Bryant returns, Le'Veon Bell will be healthy, JuJu Smith-Schuster was added in the draft ... and, oh, Ben Roethlisberger and Antonio Brown are still in the mix. Don't overlook the fact that all five starting offensive linemen have been with the team for four or more seasons. Continuity matters. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Defense, defense, defense. Particularly the secondary. The Steelers have to get better play out of a unit that allowed Tom Brady to complete 76.2 percent of his passes and average more than 9 yards per attempt in the AFC Championship Game last season. That isn't all on the players, either. The scheme was far from perfect. You cannot play basic two- and three-deep zone coverages against Brady. That's too easy for him. The Steelers can put up points in bunches, but if they can't stop the pass, they will not be a serious title threat. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Steelers ranked among the top 10 in every category. They could outperform their No. 10 ranking at QB if Roethlisberger plays effectively into his late 30s. Brady's maniacal approach to fitness and health might not be for everyone, but some level of added commitment from the 35-year-old Roethlisberger is not out of the question as he ages. -- Mike Sando
6. Dallas Cowboys
2016 record: 13-3 (lost in the divisional round)
NFC East future rank: first
Why they're here: The Cowboys have owned the draft of late. Notable selections include Dak Prescott, Ezekiel Elliott, Tyron Smith, Travis Frederick, Zack Martin and Byron Jones. Sometimes the best draft decisions are those you don't make, too. The team passed on Johnny Manziel in 2014 (taking Martin instead), and failing to trade up for Paxton Lynch in 2016 led to the fourth-round selection of Prescott. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: The Cowboys do not have anyone to rush the passer, and in a conference that featured six of the top eight finishers in Total QBR last season, that isn't good. They have tried to address the problem with players such as Greg Hardy, Randy Gregory, DeMarcus Lawrence and David Irving, but all of them have proved unreliable. Couple that with a secondary that has undergone a major overhaul and you can add the Cowboys to the list of teams with defensive concerns. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Cowboys found out last season that Prescott projects as a solid franchise quarterback. There's a chance Prescott could be more than solid. Coaches and evaluators want to see more before anointing him, but some in the league think he could be special. The No. 5 future ranking for Dallas' QB situation could be conservative if Prescott becomes truly elite. -- Mike Sando
7. Oakland Raiders
2016 record: 12-4 (lost in wild-card round)
AFC West future rank: first
Why they're here: How many teams can lay claim to having a player who profiles as a future MVP candidate (Derek Carr) and having someone who just won Defensive Player of the Year (Khalil Mack)? Moreover, how many teams found those players in the same draft class? The Raiders will need to continue to build the defense and overall depth of this roster, but their star talent is unquestioned. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: With the franchise QB locked up, a dominant young pass-rusher in the fold and a game-changing WR under contract for at least the next three seasons, there's a lot to feel good about. But with the move to Vegas looming on the horizon, and expectations growing by the day, how well is this team, this coaching staff and this front office prepared to handle it all? They can't lose sight of the process that helped get them this far. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The truth on GM Reggie McKenzie is somewhere in between the harsh criticism he received early in his tenure and the nearly universal acclaim he is enjoying now. The team's trajectory has improved sufficiently to make the case that its roster outlook should be higher than the No. 12 ranking in our projection. There have been enough successes in both the draft and free agency to make the argument. -- Mike Sando
8. Kansas City Chiefs
2016 record: 12-4 (lost in the divisional round)
AFC West future rank: second
Why they're here: Is there a more balanced roster in the NFL? Kansas City has a defense with playmakers in the secondary, an offense that boasts budding stars such as Travis Kelce and Tyreek Hill, plus terrific core special teams. This team will stay in almost any game on any Sunday. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: The Chiefs will have some major salary-cap decisions to make next March. QB Alex Smith carries a $20.6 million cap charge in 2018, $17 million of which would be wiped off the books if released. That's ideally how the Chiefs would like for it to play out, considering they're currently projected to be over the 2018 cap and would either have to restructure and/or release some contracts to get under it. The looming decision on Smith makes the development of 2017 first-rounder Patrick Mahomes II all the more important. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: If evaluators are correct in painting Mahomes as a boom-or-bust QB prospect, the Chiefs' No. 13 ranking in QB outlook might reflect the midpoint of wildly disparate potential outlooks. Sure, Mahomes could become a bust, but other quarterbacks with significant question marks have met or exceeded expectations under Andy Reid. Mahomes could realistically join them, and if he does, look out, because the talent is there. -- Mike Sando
Editor's note: The Chiefs' Front Office ranking was finalized before Kansas City's decision to hire Brett Veach as their GM on Monday.
9. Tennessee Titans
2016 record: 9-7 (Second in AFC South)
AFC South future rank: first
Why they're here: Years of misery are going to be a distant memory soon enough, as the Titans found the centerpiece of their franchise in Marcus Mariota. But the potency of having a quarterback is amplified when a team has a clear offensive identity in place. The Titans' terrific running game and offensive line will only get better after a 2017 offseason spent investing in pass-catchers. This offense has steamrolling potential. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Things are falling into place with the Titans in terms of roster construction, QB development and front office/player acquisition. The question I keep asking myself: Do they have the right coaching staff in place to take this team to the top? There are some very bright, innovative, well-respected coaches who would be interested in this job if it came open. That's something for GM Jon Robinson to keep in mind if this team does not achieve its tremendous potential. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: I tend to think most analysts are too bullish on the Titans, especially with Mariota having yet to prove he can hold up physically. However, the Titans' No. 4 ranking in draft outlook and No. 7 front-office ranking suggests the team could outperform its No. 13 ranking for overall roster outlook. One thing to remember: Stockpiling draft picks will become tougher than it was when Tennessee held the No. 1 pick in 2016. -- Mike Sando
10. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
2016 record: 9-7 (Second in NFC South)
NFC South future rank: second
Why they're here: The analysis from the Titans applies almost verbatim to Tampa Bay. Jameis Winston is a rising star and the pass-catchers around him are nightmarish to defend. The Bucs have a multidimensional passing game the next three years after adding the ultimate field-flipper in DeSean Jackson and big-play rookies O.J. Howard and wideout Chris Godwin to complement the uncoverable Mike Evans. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Keeping Winston's development trajectory on the right angle should be priority No. 1, and that starts with a clean, comfortable pocket. Winston was pressured on 35 percent of dropbacks in 2016 (fourth highest), up from 31 percent in 2015. His interception total also jumped from 15 to 18 in Year 2. While the signing of Jackson is big, I'd argue the first-round selection of Howard is even bigger for Winston. Jameis has to be better on middle-of-the-field throws for this offense to really take off, and Howard is a huge asset in that regard. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: Drafting Evans, Winston, Ali Marpet, Kwon Alexander and now Howard looks good enough on GM Jason Licht's résumé to suggest Tampa Bay could outperform its No. 13 ranking in drafting outlook -- especially now that there should be zero chance the team will take another kicker early. -- Mike Sando
11. New York Giants
2016 record: 11-5 (lost in wild-card round)
NFC East future rank: second
Why they're here: When you can rush the passer in the NFL, the rest of your defense looks better. When you can hold up in man-to-man coverage in the secondary, the rest of your defense looks better. When you can do both, you've got a case to be one of the best units in football. The Giants have speed, rushers, corners and plenty of playmakers on a frightening defense. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: How are the Giants going to improve their running game? Averaging 3.55 yards per rush (30th in the NFL) is not going to cut it. And while the additions of rookie TE Evan Engram and veteran WR Brandon Marshall are nice, the Giants didn't do anything substantial to address their major issues at offensive tackle. If they want to be legit contenders, they must rectify that in future offseasons. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Giants rank between 10th and 15th in every category, which seems about right. The home runs they have hit in recent drafts -- Odell Beckham Jr. and Landon Collins come to mind -- suggest the future in draft outlook could be brighter than their No. 15 ranking. Beckham was the 12th player selected in his draft class (2014). Collins was the 33rd taken in his (2016). -- Mike Sando
12. Indianapolis Colts
2016 record: 8-8 (Third in AFC South)
AFC South future rank: second
Why they're here: When the Colts landed the first pick in the 2012 draft, it yielded immense and immediate returns in Andrew Luck. But Luck alone isn't enough to guarantee success, and the team has now missed out on two consecutive postseasons. Indianapolis turned over its GM post this offseason, hiring away Chris Ballard from the Kansas City Chiefs. The first-time GM is extremely well-regarded around the NFL and has worked hard already to help build up a defense in major need of it. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Yes, Luck is the franchise. Yes, he needs be protected better and to protect himself better. But the defense has been an even bigger issues over the past two seasons, and as Field alluded to, Ballard has made some major investments on that side of the ball. New additions such as Johnathan Hankins, Jabaal Sheard, John Simon, Malik Hooker, Quincy Wilson and Tarell Basham must pay dividends -- and quickly. The AFC South is improving at a rapid rate, and the Colts need to keep pace. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: There's a huge gap between Indy's outlook for drafting (No. 5 ranking) and for non-QB roster (No. 23). But if the Colts draft well under Ballard, their roster outlook is going to improve as well. Throw in the No. 9 ranking among front offices -- another reflection of confidence in Ballard -- and this looks even more like a situation where roster improvement should follow. -- Mike Sando
13. Carolina Panthers
2016 record: 6-10 (Fourth in NFC South)
NFC South future rank: third
Why they're here: Which season carries more weight: the one in which the Panthers glided through the regular season and playoffs all the way to Super Bowl 50, or the one in which they stumbled to a last-place finish in the division? The Panthers have plenty of talent -- remember, this defense still features Luke Kuechly, Thomas Davis and Kawann Short -- but the offense is still an evolving question. If Cam Newton reverts to form and the new-look weapons assimilate quickly, Carolina will jump up this list in future seasons. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: The Panthers are trying to build their offense in such a way that should help extend Newton's career and help him evolve. Will the pieces they acquired, namely draft picks RB Christian McCaffrey and RB/WR Curtis Samuel, develop and be utilized correctly to make the whole thing work? Newton needs someone other than Greg Olsen who can control the middle of the field in the passing game, and he can no longer be the second-leading rusher on his team in any given season. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: Newton has the talent to give Carolina a boost from its current No. 12 ranking for QB outlook in 2019. The ranking seems fair given Newton's long-term injury concerns and accuracy issues as a passer, but no one should be shocked if Newton is one of the six or eight best QBs in the league three years from now, when guys like Tom Brady and Drew Brees could be retired or significantly diminished. -- Mike Sando
14. Cincinnati Bengals
2016 record: 6-9-1 (Third in AFC North)
AFC North future rank: second
Why they're here: The Bengals are laced with talent at the skill positions on offense -- A.J. Green was on pace for a 1,700-yard season before going down in Week 11 -- and still feature a defense that's consistently competitive. But the long-term future of the offensive line is a major question mark after a poor 2016 season got worse when two key contributors (tackle Andrew Whitworth and guard Kevin Zeitler) bolted in free agency. The pipeline doesn't appear to be stocked with future stars up front, either. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Is Marvin Lewis' leadership enough to get this team to register its first playoff win since he took over in 2003? He is currently 0-7 in the postseason, despite registering double-digit wins six times in 14 years and coaching a roster often among the league's best from 1 to 53. Yes, Lewis has often been saddled with coaching players who aren't the most dependable/professional, but he's going to have to win a playoff game soon to keep his job. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: Cincy lags in front-office outlook with a No. 20 ranking, somewhat understandable now that owner Mike Brown is 81 years old. However, Brown has taken steps over the past few seasons to prepare the team for a power transfer. Katie Blackburn and Duke Tobin have assumed larger roles in the organization, with seemingly positive results. It's plausible to think this front office could be set up well for years to come. -- Mike Sando
15. Denver Broncos
2016 record: 9-7 (Third in AFC West)
AFC West future rank: third
Why they're here: The defense remains outstanding, featuring one of the NFL's best cornerback trios (Chris Harris Jr., Aqib Talib, Bradley Roby). But 2016 proved that even an elite defense can't carry you to the playoffs every season. This team at least needs a more functional running game to be successful. Until the quarterback position comes into clearer view, the offense will be a work in progress. But if the defense can maintain its play, the Broncos should be in the playoff hunt in 2017 and beyond. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: I had serious doubts about Paxton Lynch's game -- specifically his accuracy issues -- headed into the 2016 draft. And based on his rookie season that featured 89 throws, I am still concerned. While he had flashes that made me very optimistic (at Tampa in Week 4), his performance at Jacksonville in Week 13 reaffirmed my concerns (50 percent completion rate, 4.33 yards per attempt). In fairness to Lynch, the offensive line needs to be much better in pass protection to properly evaluate his play. Lynch will need to beat out veteran Trevor Siemian for the job, or concerns will continue to grow. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: GM John Elway seems to treat coaches the way he treats players. He's not afraid to make changes even when the win-loss record is respectable. The frequent coaching turnover and relatively unproven status of new head coach Vance Joseph could help explain why Denver ranks only 24th in coaching outlook. If Elway is on to something, however, Denver could exceed expectations in that area. -- Mike Sando
16. Minnesota Vikings
2016 record: 8-8 (Third in NFC North)
NFC North future rank: second
Why they're here: Sam Bradford played well on short notice as the starter last year following Teddy Bridgewater's devastating knee injury right before the season. Now Bradford is just a year away from free agency and Bridgewater is still not ready to return to the field. There's so much to like about the roster on defense (two-time Pro-Bowler Anthony Barr is still just 25), but the uncertainty surrounding the quarterback spot drags them down in these rankings. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: The health of head coach Mike Zimmer -- who has now had eight surgeries on his right eye to correct a detached retina -- is the first thing that comes to mind for the Vikings. He is old school in every sense of the word, and I love and respect that in a head coach. But you need to have the ability to know when to say "when" and to value your health over your profession. Here's to hoping that the worst of Zimmer's eye issues are behind him -- and if they aren't, that he and the team have a plan. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Vikings got their lowest ranking (21st) in QB outlook, but their recent decision-making at the position suggests they could outperform expectations there. Bridgewater looked like a solid selection before he got hurt. The move to acquire Bradford in an emergency was defensible and could work out better in the future if Minnesota can get its offensive line figured out (Bradford is more dependent upon protection than more creative QBs). -- Mike Sando
17. Baltimore Ravens
2016 record: 8-8 (Second in AFC North)
AFC North future rank: third
Why they're here: The Ravens have been one of the league's strongest drafting teams. GM Ozzie Newsome is among the best in the business, which is reflected in several segments of this roster. But it has been a long time since the team hit on a difference-making offensive skill player in the draft (the last was Torrey Smith in 2011, while we wait to see what strides Breshad Perriman makes). The offense needs more homegrown horsepower to take the load off what is consistently a strong defense. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Offensive balance is what this team desperately needs, as they called a running play on just 32.6 percent of snaps (30th in the NFL). OC Marty Mornhinweg will need to find a way to get more out of a running game that averaged just 3.99 yards per carry last season. Much of that will come from a willingness to stick with the running game and not abandon it too quickly: The Ravens ranked 10th overall in percentage of rushes that gained 4-plus yards on first down. If Baltimore's running game doesn't improve, it won't bode well for Mornhinweg's future employment with the team and could end up causing Ravens management to make changes at the very top of the coaching pecking order. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: Baltimore understandably ranked only 18th in QB outlook. Joe Flacco can play to a higher level than that if the Ravens stabilize things around him. Constant turnover at offensive coordinator isn't helping. Mornhinweg is Flacco's fifth coordinator in six seasons. Some stability in that area and renewed commitment to the running game could help revive Flacco's career following a run of up-and-down seasons. -- Mike Sando
18. Detroit Lions
2016 record: 9-7 (lost in wild-card round)
NFC North future rank: third
Why they're here: It took GM Bob Quinn just two offseasons to reshape the offensive line. Taylor Decker is injured now, but long term, he looks like one of the most promising young tackles in football. Quinn's next task is to beef up the pass rush. If Ziggy Ansah is healthy and plays to his apex, he's a Pro Bowl talent. He has just one year left on his deal after a modest 2016 season that was riddled with injury. A reinvigorated pass rush will help this team leap to the next level. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: The Lions have had one of the worst running games in the NFL over the past five seasons (3.86 yards per carry, 29th overall). Although they spent heavily in free agency on RT Ricky Wagner and RG TJ Lang, I would still be very concerned that this offense does not have enough of a running-game component to truly take some pressure off Matthew Stafford. Further complicating matters, the Lions do not have a true No. 1 running back on the roster. Until this aspect of the offense starts producing tangible results, I would not sleep very well. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: It's too early to know what kind of GM Quinn will become in the long term. That helps explain why Detroit ranked only tied for 18th in front office and tied for 24th in drafting. Lions ownership has tended to show patience with its leadership, sometimes to a fault. That means Quinn could be given time to grow into the role, improving the longer-term outlook. -- Mike Sando
19. Philadelphia Eagles
2016 record: 7-9 (Fourth in NFC East)
NFC East future rank: third
Why they're here: The fastest way to rise in these rankings is through quarterback validation. Specifically, if Carson Wentz makes a leap in Year 2, Philly's outlook shifts upward. He surged early as a rookie, leading the Eagles to a 3-0 start. But as the season wore on, Wentz's mechanics regressed and his play fell off. But big picture, Wentz still has plenty of traits you look for in a potential franchise quarterback, which gives the Eagles plenty of hope for the future. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: When will 2017 second-round CB Sidney Jones be ready to play (Achilles tear)? And how long will it take 2017 third-round CB Rasul Douglas to develop? Until those two questions are answered, this team's upside is capped in the NFC. Even with the help of a Fletcher Cox-led pass rush, the Eagles simply do not have any other corners good enough to compete against the quality WRs they will face in their own division and conference. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: Doug Pederson is a relatively young head coach (age 49) coming off a respectable 7-9 first season. He has a promising young quarterback to build around. The Eagles' coaching situation would appear to be a glass-half-full scenario under the circumstances, but Philly ranked just 26th in coaching outlook. Beating those low expectations shouldn't require a miracle. -- Mike Sando
20. Los Angeles Chargers
2016 record: 5-11 (Fourth in AFC West)
AFC West future rank: fourth
Why they're here: The Chargers have some intriguing young talent, namely pass-rushers Joey Bosa and Melvin Ingram, cornerbacks Jason Verrett and Casey Hayward, along with wide receiver Keenan Allen and running back Melvin Gordon. What looms as a major question -- and what drags down their roster rating here -- is the Chargers' offensive line, which has put quarterback Philip Rivers under constant duress in recent seasons. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Field is right: The Chargers' offensive line allowed their QBs to be pressured on 31.5 percent of dropbacks, sixth worst in the NFL. They were just as bad at run blocking too, with rushers only gaining 2.03 yards per rush before first contract, fifth worst overall. Los Angeles wisely used second- and third-round selections on O-linemen Forrest Lamp and Dan Feeney, respectively. Now this coaching staff needs to get the unit working in unison to maximize the Chargers' window before Rivers has nothing left in the tank. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Chargers have sneakily put together a quality roster, at least in many of the starting slots. Depth is a concern, which is why the roster outlook (19th) is not rosy. Recent news that the team's future stadium will not be ready until 2020 could buy time for GM Tom Telesco to finish what he has started, under the assumption that ownership might resist making wholesale changes before entering the new stadium. -- Mike Sando
21. Miami Dolphins
2016 record: 10-6 (lost in wild-card round)
AFC East future rank: second
Why they're here: The Dolphins' defensive line has a chance to be among the most imposing in football, led by a trio of Ndamukong Suh, Cameron Wake and Charles Harris. But the secondary still remains a significant question mark, and the lack of premium cover cornerbacks will stress this defense. The Dolphins must do a better job of developing young draft picks, such as 2016 second-rounder Xavien Howard, to outperform this ranking. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Is Ryan Tannehill really the team's long-term future at quarterback? The Dolphins could save $15.2 million on their 2018 cap if they released Tannehill prior to the fifth day of the 2018 league year. It's an interesting predicament: Tannehill did post career highs in completion percentage (67.1), TD percentage (4.9) and passer rating (93.5) in 2017, while going 8-5 as a starter. But he also had his season cut short by ACL/MCL sprains. I see more questions than answers with Tannehill. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: Our rankings for the Dolphins suggest we're exceedingly high on Adam Gase and the coaching staff but lukewarm at best on everything else. If QBs are Gase's specialty, then it's not so difficult to envision the Dolphins' outlook at that position improving upon the current No. 20 ranking. Somewhere in the middle teens could be realistic for Tannehill or whichever QB Gase seeks down the line. -- Mike Sando
22. Arizona Cardinals
2016 record: 7-8-1 (Second in NFC West)
NFC West future rank: second
Why they're here: It seems at least plausible that the Cardinals could undergo a major shift following the 2017 season. Carson Palmer will be a free agent and there's no succession plan presently in place. Larry Fitzgerald also enters the final year of his contract. Their importance to the franchise -- Fitzgerald is perhaps the greatest player in its history -- cannot be overlooked. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Field mentioned it, but Palmer turns 38 in December and the Cardinals still don't have his presumed replacement on the roster. Every hit Palmer takes could be his last, and he took a beating in 2016, getting sacked 40 times and hit countless others. The Cardinals' decision-making team should be worried sick about the future of the QB position in the short and long term. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The longer-term coaching outlook could improve if Bruce Arians' health issues subside. It has been speculated in the league and media over the past couple seasons that Arians might be forced to walk away, but what if that is not the case? At age 64, there is still a chance Arians could provide some solid seasons if his health stabilizes. -- Mike Sando
23. Houston Texans
2016 record: 9-7 (lost in divisional round)
AFC South future rank: third
Why they're here: This is lower than many would expect the Texans to be ranked, given they have won consecutive division titles and finished first in yards per game allowed last season despite missing J.J. Watt for most of the season. But the ranking will pivot based on Deshaun Watson's progression. If he's a home run pick, Houston will contend in the AFC. This much is certain: After already trading away both its first- and second-round picks in 2018, the Texans need Watson to be their answer at quarterback. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: When you move up in the draft to select a QB, you had better be right. The Texans' regime hasn't had the best luck at identifying/developing a franchise QB. Brock Osweiler, Brandon Weeden, Brian Hoyer, Ryan Mallett and Ryan Fitzpatrick all turned out to be backups/marginal starters. Watson's development (or lack thereof) will determine how Bill O'Brien is remembered in Houston when his time is up. Count on it. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: Houston ranks only 24th in quarterback outlook, quite a bit lower than teams such as Kansas City (13th) and the Chargers (15th). Why? There's a realistic chance that Watson will be as good or better than Patrick Mahomes II or whomever might be behind center for the Chiefs three years from now. -- Mike Sando
24. Washington Redskins
2016 record: 8-7-1 (Third in NFC East)
NFC East future rank: fourth
Why they're here: To reiterate: These rankings are a forecast of the next three years. The saga surrounding Washington and quarterback Kirk Cousins is beyond well-documented. As things currently stand, he's under contract for just one more season. If he doesn't return, the heir apparent is, well, not apparent. The team has until July 17 to agree to a long-term deal with Cousins, which would catapult this team up the rankings. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: The negotiations between the Redskins and Cousins will go a long way toward determining just how successful Jay Gruden ends up being in D.C. No matter how you slice it, you just can't easily replace a QB who throws for 4,900-plus yards, completes 67 percent of his passes and averages 8.1 yards per attempt. You better find a way to get Cousins signed to a deal that does not destroy your salary cap for the next three years. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: It's all about Cousins in D.C. -- and for good reason. As Field mentioned, the Redskins' No. 22 ranking at quarterback would be on the low side if the QB gets a long-term contract. One important item to remember: If the two sides don't agree to an extension by the mid-July deadline, they cannot negotiate again until after the season. Cousins very well could be a lame duck in Washington this year, with potential unrestricted free agency in his future. Will the team really let one of its most important players leave? -- Mike Sando
25. New Orleans Saints
2016 record: 7-9 (Third in NFC South)
NFC South future rank: fourth
Why they're here: Part of this is that Drew Brees is currently entering the final season of his deal, but there are roster holes that drag New Orleans further down. One of the issues facing New Orleans is that it has constantly been tight against the cap. There is always maneuvering that can be done to create cap space, but it limits your margin for error when you have limited cap resources. That's something to clean up. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Brees has started all but two regular-season games since joining the Saints in 2006, throwing for more than 5,000 yards five times and 30-plus TDs in nine of 11 seasons. At 38 years old, the end is very near, and when he decides -- or his body decides -- it's time to go, what is the Saints' succession plan? Chase Daniel? I don't think so. They have no one in the pipeline for coach Sean Payton to start developing, and that's a problem that needs to be corrected. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Saints' No. 28 front-office ranking reflects the team's inability to field a competitive defense, the possibility that Payton might not remain for the long haul, ownership uncertainty and other factors. A case also can be made that the NFL's heavy-handed punishment in Bountygate put the team (and specifically the front office) in an impossible situation, and that the outlook could improve over time. -- Mike Sando
26. Buffalo Bills
2016 record: 7-9 (Third in AFC East)
AFC East future rank: third
Why they're here: The Bills' organizational structure underwent arguably the most extreme overhaul of any in the NFL this past offseason, with GM Brandon Beane and coach Sean McDermott now in charge. Whether or not Tyrod Taylor is the quarterback beyond 2017, a primary task of the Bills' front-office duo is to upgrade at wide receiver. Sammy Watkins has just one year left on his rookie contract, and health issues have plagued his career thus far. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: McDermott opted to keep Taylor around this offseason, restructuring his deal into a two-year, $30.5 million contract. That's a reasonable salary to pay a quarterback like Taylor. But the only thing that matters for the Bills is finding a way to challenge New England for AFC East supremacy. Is Taylor good enough to do that? I'm not a believer. We shall see. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Bills finished with the sixth-lowest ranking in draft outlook, but it's realistic to think Buffalo is finally well-positioned for a stronger showing in that regard. Hiring a head coach and general manager during the same offseason means the Bills' front office is synced up. While that doesn't assure drafting success, it can help facilitate it. -- Mike Sando
27. Jacksonville Jaguars
2016 record: 3-13 (Fourth in AFC South)
AFC South future rank: fourth
Why they're here: The Jaguars have actively pursued top defensive targets in free agency to supplement a run of major draft investments, building a potentially imposing defense. But unless and until the quarterback issue is solved in Jacksonville, this franchise will have a hard time climbing out of the 20s in this list. Blake Bortles was an unquestionable disappointment in 2016 and now faces a pivotal 2017 season. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Bortles has thrown 34 interceptions over the past two seasons, tied for the most in the league, and his 83.4 passer rating ranks 30th overall during the same period. The drafting of RB Leonard Fournette signals an increased emphasis on the ground game in Jacksonville, which should take some of the pressure off Bortles. But until he becomes a better decision-maker, this team will continue to reside in the bottom fourth of the league. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: While there's no sense in expressing optimism over some unknown future starting QB, the Jaguars' No. 30 ranking in QB outlook is going to improve one way or another. Most likely, Bortles is either going to play well enough to keep his job or poorly enough for the team to move on from him following the 2017 season. Either way, the outlook improves. -- Mike Sando
28. Los Angeles Rams
2016 record: 4-12 (Third in NFC West)
NFC West future rank: third
Why they're here: I find it a bit hasty of people to write off Jared Goff's NFL outlook following just seven starts, but his rookie season was certainly a little bumpy. Beyond being the No. 1 pick in the draft, Los Angeles mortgaged significant draft capital to acquire Goff. The positive? He's in good hands now with a revamped coaching staff led by offensive whiz Sean McVay. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: McVay and QB coach Matt LaFleur must determine if Goff's nightmare rookie season was just a part of the inevitable maturation process, or if he is destined to be an underachiever. I am a firm believer in a quarterback's success/failure being largely determined by how he is coached and how the team is built around him. The Rams will find out soon enough how well they have done at selecting a coach and building a team. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The No. 25 ranking in QB outlook is 100 percent understandable and arguably could be optimistic based on the shaky first impression Goff made while posting an 0-7 starting record last season. However, there is also agreement in the league that McVay will dramatically upgrade the offensive scheming, which could realistically improve the long-term QB outlook -- whether or not Goff is part of the picture. (A McVay reunion with Kirk Cousins is another possibility down the line.) -- Mike Sando
29. Chicago Bears
2016 record: 3-13 (Fourth in NFC North)
NFC North future rank: fourth
Why they're here: It's hard enough for a quarterback to transition to the NFL level as is, but Mitchell Trubisky will face an added challenge of having no established pass-catchers to target. The top wide receiver in Chicago is either Cameron Meredith or Kevin White. Meredith has 77 career catches, while White checked off every physical box coming out of West Virginia, but injuries have essentially rendered him a nonfactor his first two seasons. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Like most of the teams at the bottom of this list, Chicago needs to figure out what it has at QB, but that's not what worries me most about this team. The relationship (or lack thereof) between GM Ryan Pace and head coach John Fox is concerning, and conflict between key decision-makers can become an insurmountable obstacle for a rebuilding team. Before anything can really be accomplished, this situation needs to be resolved one way or another. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The coaching outlook for the Bears is brutal (31st) mainly because it appears unlikely that Fox will survive the next season or two. It's tough to feel much optimism for Fox & Co. right now. That doesn't necessarily mean the Bears will have terrible coaches three seasons down the line. They could keep the current group or attract top coaching talent if the as-yet-unknown Trubisky hits his stride over the next two seasons. -- Mike Sando
30. San Francisco 49ers
2016 record: 2-14 (Fourth in NFC West)
NFC West future rank: fourth
Why they're here: How does a team crater from first in our 2013 Future Power Rankings to 30th now? There's a litany of reasons, but organizational stability has been a critical issue since that time. Jim Harbaugh was ousted as head coach after the 2014 season. Since that time, San Francisco has hired three new head coaches and replaced GM Trent Baalke. With John Lynch and Kyle Shanahan now in control, organizational harmony is atop the list of keys to success. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: Shanahan and Lynch appear to be hitting on all cylinders in their rookie season together, but until they get the QB they want, it is all just setting the table, like with any team. Brian Hoyer and Matt Barkley are quality backups, and I don't see 2017 third-round pick C.J. Beathard as a starter in the league. I like how this team is being built, but QB remains a major concern. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: Add the 49ers to the list of weak teams with a realistic shot at drafting one of the highly regarded QB prospects in 2018. San Francisco ranks only 29th in QB outlook. That's understandable as long as guys like Hoyer figure prominently into the equation. Big QB changes are coming in the next year or so, however. The outlook will improve. -- Mike Sando
31. New York Jets
2016 record: 5-11 (Fourth in AFC East)
AFC East future rank: fourth
Why they're here: The Jets are in tear-down mode. It's not a mystery. After purging the roster of several veterans on more lucrative deals, the Jets have started compiling some assets. Question marks pepper the roster, starting at quarterback, but the team also possesses what is almost assuredly the least imposing group of wide receivers in the NFL. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: This is by far the worst QB situation in the league. They need to figure out whether Christian Hackenberg can give them a chance to win. Then they can move on to the monumental task of rebuilding the entire roster. This team is not winning anytime soon. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Jets ranked last in QB outlook, but there is a very good chance the team will be in position to select from a highly rated draft class in 2018. Using an early pick for someone such as USC's Sam Darnold would quickly move the Jets into the top 10 for QB outlook when the time comes to produce future rankings next offseason. That is a realistic scenario given how poorly the Jets seem destined to finish in 2017. -- Mike Sando
32. Cleveland Browns
2016 record: 1-15 (Fourth in AFC North)
AFC North future rank: fourth
Why they're here: In consecutive drafts, the Browns have eschewed the chance to use any of their four first-round picks on a quarterback, instead drafting Cody Kessler and DeShone Kizer in the third and second rounds, respectively, in successive years. It's a drumbeat going on 20 years running: There is no clear answer at quarterback in Cleveland. -- Field Yates
Biggest worry: I believe the Browns have some reasons to be optimistic given how their most recent draft played out. But before getting too high on their future, I want to see Myles Garrett on the field playing regular-season games, and I want to see how Kizer develops as a pro QB. The Browns belong right where they are in this ranking until proved otherwise. -- Louis Riddick
What could change for the better: The Browns ranked 31st or 32nd in every category, but they should be in fantastic position to improve markedly at quarterback. They're among several teams, including the Jets, who should be in position to benefit from a 2018 draft that is expected to feature at least a couple of very highly regarded quarterbacks, including Sam Darnold of USC. -- Mike Sando