Future NBA Power Rankings: Full category rankings

Kevin Pelton
Close
Kevin Pelton
ESPN Senior Writer
- Co-author, Pro Basketball Prospectus series
- Formerly a consultant with the Indiana Pacers
- Developed WARP rating and SCHOENE system
Follow on X
Bobby Marks
Close
Bobby Marks
ESPN
Follow on X

Sep 21, 2017, 08:00 AM ET

So you're wondering how we put the NBA Future Power Rankings together? Here's how we did it.

To determine the Future Power Rating, we rated each team in five categories. Here's how they did it and how the teams ranked in each individual category.

We determined that the most important category is a team's current roster and the future potential of those players -- that category accounts for more than 50 percent of each NBA team's overall Future Power Rating.

At the same time, we looked at many other factors, such as management, ownership, coaching, a team's spending habits, its cap situation, the reputation of the city and the franchise, and what kind of draft picks we expect the team to have in the future.

Players (58.3 percent)

Players

Team	Rating
1. Golden State	100
2. Houston	82.5
3. Boston	80
4. San Antonio	70
4. Minnesota	70
6. Washington	65
6. Denver	65
6. Oklahoma City	65
9. Toronto	62.5
9. Milwaukee	62.5
11. Portland	60
11. Cleveland	60
13. Utah	55
13. Philadelphia	55
15. L.A. Clippers	52.5
16. Miami	50
16. Detroit	50
16. New Orleans	50
19. Charlotte	47.5
20. Memphis	42.5
21. L.A. Lakers	37.5
21. Orlando	37.5
23. New York	32.5
24. Dallas	30
25. Indiana	27.5
25. Sacramento	27.5
25. Phoenix	27.5
28. Brooklyn	22.5
29. Atlanta	17.5
30. Chicago	15
Current players and potential for the future

Management (16.7 percent)

Management

Team	Rating
1. Golden State	97.5
2. San Antonio	92.5
3. Boston	87.5
4. Houston	77.5
5. Miami	72.5
5. Oklahoma City	72.5
7. Dallas	67.5
7. Utah	67.5
9. Portland	65
10. Toronto	60
11. Washington	55
12. Minnesota	52.5
13. L.A. Clippers	50
14. Brooklyn	47.5
14. Charlotte	47.5
14. Denver	47.5
17. L.A. Lakers	45
17. Orlando	45
19. Philadelphia	42.5
19. Cleveland	42.5
19. Detroit	42.5
19. Memphis	42.5
23. Atlanta	35
23. Milwaukee	35
25. Indiana	30
26. Sacramento	22.5
27. Chicago	20
28. New York	17.5
29. Phoenix	15
30. New Orleans	10
Quality/stability of front office, ownership, coaching

Money (8.3 percent)

Money

Team	Rating
1. Chicago	97.5
2. L.A. Lakers	92.5
2. Indiana	92.5
4. Philadelphia	90
5. Atlanta	80
6. Phoenix	70
6. Dallas	70
6. Sacramento	70
9. Brooklyn	65
10. New York	62.5
10. Utah	62.5
12. San Antonio	47.5
12. Orlando	47.5
14. L.A. Clippers	45
15. Cleveland	42.5
15. Minnesota	42.5
17. Detroit	40
17. Charlotte	40
19. Memphis	37.5
19. Milwaukee	37.5
21. Denver	35
22. Boston	30
22. New Orleans	30
24. Miami	25
24. Houston	25
24. Oklahoma City	25
27. Golden State	22.5
28. Portland	20
28. Toronto	20
30. Washington	15
Projected salary-cap situation

Market (8.3 percent)

Market

Team	Rating
1. L.A. Lakers	90
1. Golden State	90
3. New York	85
4. L.A. Clippers	82.5
4. Miami	82.5
6. Brooklyn	75
7. Houston	65
8. Boston	60
8. Cleveland	60
10. Phoenix	55
10. Chicago	55
10. Dallas	55
13. San Antonio	52.5
14. Orlando	50
15. Portland	47.5
15. Washington	47.5
17. Philadelphia	45
17. Denver	45
17. Toronto	45
20. Atlanta	42.5
21. Detroit	40
21. Oklahoma City	40
23. New Orleans	35
23. Charlotte	35
25. Indiana	30
25. Utah	30
25. Memphis	30
28. Sacramento	25
29. Milwaukee	17.5
30. Minnesota	15
Appeal to future acquisitions

Draft (8.3 percent)

Draft

Team	Rating
1. Atlanta	95
2. Phoenix	90
3. Boston	87.5
4. Philadelphia	85
5. Cleveland	80
6. Chicago	77.5
7. Indiana	67.5
8. Dallas	65
8. New York	65
8. Orlando	65
11. New Orleans	52.5
11. Sacramento	52.5
13. Detroit	50
14. Utah	47.5
15. Charlotte	45
15. Memphis	45
17. Denver	42.5
17. Milwaukee	42.5
17. Portland	42.5
20. Brooklyn	40
20. Minnesota	40
20. Washington	40
23. L.A. Lakers	37.5
24. L.A. Clippers	32.5
25. San Antonio	30
26. Golden State	27.5
27. Miami	22.5
27. Oklahoma City	22.5
27. Toronto	22.5
30. Houston	17.5
Future draft picks; draft positioning