Chad Ford
Close Chad Ford
ESPN Senior Writer Senior NBA Writer for ESPN.com
ESPN Insider NBA Draft Analyst since 2002
Writes ESPN's NBA Draft Top 100 and Lottery Mock Draft
Kevin Pelton
Close Kevin Pelton
ESPN Senior Writer Co-author, Pro Basketball Prospectus series
Formerly a consultant with the Indiana Pacers
Developed WARP rating and SCHOENE system
Oct 3, 2016, 09:00 AM ET So you're wondering how we put the NBA Future Power Rankings together? Here's how we did it.
FUTURE POWER RATING PLAYERS (worth 58.3% of score): Current players and their potential for the future, factoring in expected departures
MANAGEMENT (worth 16.7% of score): Quality and stability of front office, ownership, coaching
MONEY (worth 8.3% of score): Projected salary-cap situation; ability and willingness to exceed cap and pay luxury tax
MARKET (worth 8.3% of score): Appeal to future acquisitions based on team quality, franchise reputation, city's desirability as a destination, market size, taxes, business and entertainment opportunities, arena quality, fans
DRAFT (worth 8.3% of score): Future draft picks; draft positioning
To determine the Future Power Rating, we rated each team in five categories. Here's how they did it and how the teams ranked in each individual category.
We determined that the most important category is a team's current roster and the future potential of those players -- that category accounts for 50 percent of each NBA team's overall Future Power Rating.
At the same time, we looked at many other factors, such as management, ownership, coaching, a team's spending habits, its cap situation, the reputation of the city and the franchise, and what kind of draft picks we expect the team to have in the future.
Players (50 percent) Players Team Rating Prev. Rating 1. Golden State 100 99.5 2. Cleveland 92.5 92.5 3. San Antonio 75 72.5 4. Minnesota 70 62.5 5. Boston 65 49 6. Utah 65 60 7. L.A. Clippers 65 67 8. Portland 60 56.5 9. Toronto 55 55.5 10. Houston 55 55 11. Detroit 55 48.5 12. Oklahoma City 52.5 70 13. Washington 52.5 57.5 14. Charlotte 50 42.5 15. Milwaukee 50 42 16. New Orleans 50 55.5 17. Indiana 47.5 51.5 18. Orlando 45 42.5 19. Chicago 42.5 45 20. Denver 42.5 42.5 21. Atlanta 40 45 22. Memphis 37.5 42.5 23. Miami 35 53.5 24. Philadelphia 35 22.5 25. Phoenix 35 27.5 26. New York 35 32.5 27. L.A. Lakers 30 20 28. Dallas 27.5 32.5 29. Sacramento 25 30 30. Brooklyn 10 10 Current players and potential for the future
Management (16.7 percent) Management Team Rating Prev. Rating 1. Golden State 97.5 97 2. San Antonio 95 97 3. Boston 90 90 4. Portland 77.5 72.5 5. Utah 72 62.5 6. Miami 70 77.5 7. Oklahoma City 65 72.5 8. Minnesota 62.5 50 9. Dallas 62.5 65 10. Toronto 62.5 57.5 11. Cleveland 60 53 12. Atlanta 55 55 13. Houston 50 52.5 14. L.A. Clippers 50 50 15. Detroit 50 50 16. Charlotte 45 42.5 17. Indiana 42.5 45 18. Chicago 42.5 52.5 19. Philadelphia 40 40 20. Orlando 40 40 21. Milwaukee 40 40 22. Denver 37.5 35 23. Memphis 37.5 42.5 24. Washington 35 35 25. Brooklyn 32.5 30 26. L.A. Lakers 27.5 27.5 27. New Orleans 25 32.5 28. Phoenix 17.5 20 29. New York 15 20 30. Sacramento 10.5 8 Quality/stability of front office, ownership, coaching
Money (16.7 percent) Money Team Rating Prev. Rating 1. Brooklyn 97.5 67.5 2. Philadelphia 97 97 3. Minnesota 87.5 52.5 4. Sacramento 77.5 50 5. Phoenix 72.5 65 6. Utah 72.5 60 7. L.A. Lakers 70 97.5 8. Boston 67.5 70 9. Denver 67.5 45 10. Indiana 60 55 11. New Orleans 57.5 35 12. Chicago 55 47.5 13. New York 52.5 42.5 14. Atlanta 52.5 57.5 15. Miami 50 50 16. Orlando 50 80 17. San Antonio 50 10 18. Houston 45 45 19. Dallas 45 52.5 20. Oklahoma City 45 32.5 21. Milwaukee 42.5 50 22. L.A. Clippers 30 12.5 23. Memphis 27.5 52.5 24. Charlotte 22.5 47.5 25. Washington 20 60 26. Cleveland 18 7.5 27. Golden State 17.5 25 28. Portland 17.5 45 29. Toronto 17.5 12.5 30. Detroit 15 35.5 Projected salary-cap situation
Market (8.3 percent) Market Team Rating Prev. Rating 1. L.A. Lakers 90 90 2. Golden State 90 80 3. New York 87.5 87.5 4. Miami 85 90 5. L.A. Clippers 82.5 82.5 6. Brooklyn 77.5 75 7. Cleveland 70 70 8. Phoenix 62.5 62.5 9. Houston 62.5 67.5 10. Dallas 57.5 62.5 11. Chicago 52.5 55 12. Orlando 52.5 55 13. San Antonio 52.5 52.5 14. Boston 50 45 15. Washington 47.5 50 16. Portland 47.5 46.5 17. Denver 42.5 42.5 18. Philadelphia 40 40 19. Atlanta 40 37.5 20. Toronto 40 35 21. Charlotte 40 38.5 22. New Orleans 37.5 36.5 23. Indiana 35 35 24. Oklahoma City 32.5 37.5 25. Memphis 32 30 26. Detroit 25 25 27. Minnesota 20 20 28. Milwaukee 20 20 29. Utah 17.5 18 30. Sacramento 10.5 10.5 Appeal to future acquisitions
Draft (8.3 percent) Draft Team Rating Prev. Rating 1. Philadelphia 100 97 2. Boston 95 97.5 3. Phoenix 90 82.5 4. Denver 72.5 85 5. Dallas 62.5 40 6. Chicago 60 57.5 7. L.A. Lakers 60 57.5 8. New Orleans 60 47.5 9. Orlando 60 60 10. Utah 60 62.5 11. Minnesota 57.5 60 12. New York 57.5 37.5 13. Atlanta 55 52.5 14. Milwaukee 55 60 15. Indiana 50 47.5 16. Toronto 50 62.5 17. Washington 50 42.5 18. Charlotte 47.5 47.5 19. Miami 45 30 20. Portland 45 45 21. Sacramento 42.5 47.5 22. Detroit 35 47.5 23. Houston 32.5 37.5 24. Oklahoma City 32.5 32.5 25. San Antonio 27.5 32.5 26. Brooklyn 25 15 27. L.A. Clippers 22.5 30 28. Memphis 22.5 32.5 29. Cleveland 15 22.5 30. Golden State 12.5 25 Future draft picks; draft positioning