Arshdeep Singh didn't look back. He had done his bit - secured a false shot from Quinton de Kock - and just kept on jogging through. Wake up babe, a new celebrappeal just dropped.
A few hours later, the India left-arm quick coaxed another mis-hit. And this time he whipped right round to see if the catch would be taken. On his face was a rare kind of anxiety. On a scale of 1 to 10, it was just north of seeing three dots appearing and disappearing while texting your crush.
Arshdeep was on his haunches when Ruturaj Gaikwad did his part and ended Marco Jansen's stay at the wicket. This game was no longer fun.
Signs of South Africa going on to complete the joint-highest chase by any team against India in India began to show up in the 28th over. Rohit Sharma spent more time in Harshit Rana's ear than at mid-off where he was supposed to field. In the 30th over, he went up to Rohan Pandit, who was making a big step up on Wednesday, umpiring in an India ODI for the first time. Those other four matches in Dubai between USA, UAE and Nepal can't have possibly prepared him to deal with one of the biggest names in cricket expressing abject displeasure about the condition of the ball.
Pandit went to Rod Tucker, who officiated the 2019 World Cup final, for a little help and he had zero sympathy for India's plight. Even when India did eventually get a drier Kookaburra, it was whacked straight out of the ground. This game was now just cruel. On a scale of 1 to 10, it was just short of doing a simple stretch at the gym and hearing a very loud rip.
"Even scoring 350 is very difficult when batting first," Gaikwad said at the post-match presentation. "There's moisture in the wicket in the first ten overs and the ball doesn't come onto the bat that well. After 34 overs, there's only one ball and the wicket also slows down, so it's not easy to hit.
We scored 350 in the last match, 360 in this match, so there's an improvement of ten runs. Any more improvement you probably cannot pre-decide. You can think you will score 380-400, but the opposition is also good, they have got good bowlers. So you cannot have that gameplan."
Conditions did change, as Gaikwad said. The toss did matter, as KL Rahul said. Dew made run-scoring easier, as Aiden Markram said. But through it all an Indian side without Shubman Gill and Shreyas Iyer and Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj kept fighting. A South African side also skewered by injury refused to go away. Tony de Zorzi actually thought he could get the last 31 runs off 31 balls on one functioning leg. One attempt, hopping between the wickets, showed that though he was brave he was being foolish. He ended up watching the rest of the chase from the dugout, still kitted from head to toe.
"I feel at phases we bowled really well," Gaikwad said. "I think first 10-15 overs we bowled really well but after that there was obviously huge amount of dew and because of that the spinners were slightly out of the game and I think after that I feel every South African batter who ever came in chipped really well, played really well. So I think lot of credit goes to them, they batted really well and hats off to them." He left out the part where the match-winner who went on to make 110 was dropped on 53.
Until Wednesday, there had only been seven successful chases of even 300-plus scores against India in India. Keeping it there required an enormous effort from the hosts. Some of them came away a little worse for wear. Prasidh Krishna, whose role in the middle overs is to hit the deck, wasn't getting any purchase. Still the team insisted that he keep trying and he would now hope they see his figures - 15.4 overs for 133 runs - with some leniency.
South Africa running down 359 required a lot of composure. By the end, there were echoes of not one but two hall-of-fame finishes. The equation reading 27 off 30 took the mind back to Bridgetown. Keshav Maharaj's appearance with the series on the line punched a hole straight through to Chennai 2023. The man still has ice in his veins. He was leaving balls in the 48th over, confident in his judgment that Rana's bouncers were too high and would be called wide.
In these situations, Indian cricket grounds become impossible engines. The silence in them turns deafening. This game - sandwiched between a seminal Test series result and T20 World Cup prep - had no business being this dramatic. On a scale of 1 to 10, it was everything.