Best performances - Batsmen
RR Pant
42(31) 6x4 - 0x6
Control %50%
- Productive Shot
- flick
- 14 runs
- 2x4 - 0x6
Mohammad Rizwan
31(44) 1x4 - 1x6
Control %70%
- Productive Shot
- off drive
- 9 runs
- 0x4 - 1x6
09/06Result
19th Match, Group A, ICC Men's T20 World Cup at New York, Jun 9 2024
-
![India]( "India")
-
![Pakistan]( "Pakistan")
113/7 (20 ov)
Player of the Match
09/06Result
19th Match, Group A, ICC Men's T20 World Cup at New York, Jun 9 2024
-
![India]( "India")
-
![Pakistan]( "Pakistan")
113/7 (20 ov)
Player of the Match
Best performances - Bowlers
JJ Bumrah
- O4
- M0
- R14
- W3
- Eco3.50
| 1W | ||||
| 1W | ||||
| 1W | ||||
- FTFULL TOSS
- YYORKER
- FFULL LENGTH
- GGOOD LENGTH
- SGSHORT OF GOOD LENGTH
- SSHORT LENGTH
Naseem Shah
- O4
- M0
- R21
- W3
- Eco5.25
| 1W | ||||
- FTFULL TOSS
- YYORKER
- FFULL LENGTH
- GGOOD LENGTH
- SGSHORT OF GOOD LENGTH
- SSHORT LENGTH
| 1W | ||||
| 1W | ||||
Partnerships
India - Innings
Pakistan - Innings
Manhattan
Run rate graph
Worm
Match Coverage
All Match NewsRohit, Bumrah and the art of defending
It would have been easy for a captain to burn through his key bowlers too early, but Rohit Sharma got the balance spot on
Kirsten bemoans Pakistan's 'poor decision-making'
Player of the Match Bumrah lauds India's bowlers for keeping calm even as conditions eased out for batting
Old debate, simple answer: Pakistan's batting just not very good
Could Mohammad Rizwan have taken more risks? Either way, the target should have been chased
India defend a record low as head-to-head reaches 7-1
All the key stats from a low-scoring thriller in New York
Babar: 'We were not up to the mark'
Pakistan captain says lack of rhythm upfront with the bat, and then again in the middle overs, cost his side against India
Videos
ICC Men's T20 World Cup
| Super Eights, Group 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | M | W | L | PT | NRR |
| IND | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 2.017 |
| AFG | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -0.305 |
| AUS | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -0.331 |
| BAN | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -1.709 |
| Super Eights, Group 2 | |||||
| Team | M | W | L | PT | NRR |
| SA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0.599 |
| ENG | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1.992 |
| WI | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.963 |
| USA | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -3.906 |
| Group A | |||||
| Team | M | W | L | PT | NRR |
| IND | 4 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1.137 |
| USA | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0.127 |
| PAK | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.294 |
| CAN | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -0.493 |
| IRE | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -1.293 |
| Group B | |||||
| Team | M | W | L | PT | NRR |
| AUS | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 2.791 |
| ENG | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3.611 |
| SCOT | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1.255 |
| NAM | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | -2.585 |
| OMA | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -3.062 |
| Group C | |||||
| Team | M | W | L | PT | NRR |
| WI | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 3.257 |
| AFG | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 1.835 |
| NZ | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.415 |
| UGA | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | -4.51 |
| PNG | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -1.268 |
| Group D | |||||
| Team | M | W | L | PT | NRR |
| SA | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 0.47 |
| BAN | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0.616 |
| SL | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.863 |
| NED | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | -1.358 |
| NEP | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -0.542 |