END OF OVER:
45 | 5 Runs 3 Wkts | NZ: 291/10 | RR: 6.46

  • Tim Southee0 (0b)
  • Josh Hazlewood9-0-52-6
  • Mitchell Starc9-0-52-0

KK: "An undergraduate degree in computer engineering, scrapped through complex AI algorithms, signal processing theories and maths.. yet, Duckworth-Lewis method still manages to blow (a hole in) my mind after all these years.."

4.50pm Play to restart at 5.15pm if we don't have more rain. Awaiting the revised target and overs. Australia will have to get 235 in 33 overs. Three bowlers to bowl seven overs, two to bowl six. For what it's worth, the cut-off time for this game's 7.34pm

Rishav: "Target seems quite fair. Cant be asked to chase 250 with 13 overs reduced. Only thing I want is to have the best bowler bowl nine overs like Australia got." Ah, well.

Nisal tries to decode the DL phenomenon: "I guess the reduction in target in certain situations under D/L is because when there is a reduction in number of overs for the side batting first, suddenly you have lesser chance of getting bowled out so you can take more risks. So more the wickets lost before the interval, the lesser the revised target will be."

Irfan: "The fact that Aus is happy with additional lost overs, means that D/L does not fairly revise targets. The way it is supposed to work is that the revised target should be equivalent and neither team should feel happy about overs being lost. These days, rain forecast almost certainly means batting second after winning the toss. The co-efficients in the D/L equations need to be revised for sure."

For those shocked by what's unfolding within the Indian camp - Kumble-Kohli and all that - here's an opportunity to have your say.

4.40pm Grey. Still spitting. A while away from a restart, I suppose. We're losing an over for every four minutes lost. Australians won't mind the rain for now. Shorter the game, better their prospects.

Our stats editor S Rajesh explains the DLS situation we've been faced with today:

If the interruption had happened after 25 overs, with NZ two down, Australia's target would have gone up by two runs. If it had happened after 35 overs, with NZ two down, it would have gone up by eight runs. The later the interruption happens, the greater is the opportunity lost to score, for the batting team (if they have wickets in hand)

Wickets lost in the end doesn't matter. If they were four down after 9.3 overs, lets assume, and yet finished on 320 after 46, the target for Australia would've come down to 310. Bizarre?

4.15pm Bad news, folks. The rain is back. Covers on. So we could be in for a delay again. We lost 109 minutes in the first innings, remember. Fingers crossed for this one. The good thing, though, is this seems to be a passing shower.

"It will be a (typically) beautiful evening. And bluebirds will do my washing up," says George Dobell from Edgbaston

This is New Zealand's highest score against Australia at a global event, beating the 286 they made in Chennai, all those years ago, in 1996. Australia have won 17 out of the 18 games both sides have played at neutral venues since 1999. Will take an inspired bowling performance for New Zealand to buck the trend despite doing most things right in the first innings.

3.50pm A lightning start from Luke Ronchi, a mature 99-run stand between Ross Taylor and Kane Williamson, who made a brilliant 100. But it was all Australia at the death... claiming 7 for 37 in the closing overs to keep their target below 300. No adjustment from Duckworth-Lewis, apparently. Shashank will be back with the chase in 20 minutes.

44.6
W
Hazlewood to Boult, OUT, edged and gone! Hazlewood wraps up the innings with 6 for 52, a perfect Test-match line and length, kissing the edge of the No.11. What a regrouping from Australia. They'll be firm favourites when the chase gets underway shortly

TA Boult c †Wade b Hazlewood 0 (2b 0x4 0x6) SR: 0.00

44.5
0
Hazlewood to Boult, no run, good nut for a hat-trick ball! Ghosting past the edge from a very full length
44.4
W
Hazlewood to Santner, OUT, drilled into the covers, Smith reaches high, and Hazlewood has a five-for with his second in a row!

MJ Santner c Smith b Hazlewood 8 (11m 7b 1x4 0x6) SR: 114.28

Gayan: "How much will be the Interval Miller???" Thirty minutes, apparently.

Meanwhile, two wickets, and nine balls, for Maxwell to equal, and maybe break Jonty Rhodes' record of five outfield catches...

44.3
W
Hazlewood to Milne, OUT, another supreme connection, but straight to Maxwell on the rope! He utterly smoked that pull, but some you win, some you lose

AF Milne c Maxwell b Hazlewood 11 (3m 7b 2x4 0x6) SR: 157.14

44.2
4
Hazlewood to Milne, FOUR, short, and slapped heartily over the leg side. Picked it well, stepped right back on his stumps, threw his weight behind the shot, and beat the sweeper
44.1
1
Hazlewood to Santner, 1 run, steps across the crease to waft a drive to mid-off.

Twelve balls. 300 is still very much on, but they need to get a wriggle on

END OF OVER:
44 | 10 Runs | NZ: 286/7 | RR: 6.50

  • Mitchell Santner7 (5b)
  • Adam Milne7 (5b)
  • Mitchell Starc9-0-52-0
  • Josh Hazlewood8-0-47-3
43.6
1
Starc to Santner, 1 run, full length, in the blockhole, drilled to cover
43.6
1w
Starc to Santner, 1 wide, misdirected. A good take down the leg side from Wade
43.5
1
Starc to Milne, 1 run, outside off stump, floated into the covers with a loose-limbed drive
43.4
1
Starc to Santner, 1 run, another full toss, well, it's a tactic ...
43.3
1
Starc to Milne, 1 run, fenced into the gap

bha: "Mr. Miller, your reply to Gareth suggests that you need a class or two about anger management. Just saying!!!" No really, that is the dictionary definition

43.2
1
Starc to Santner, 1 run, another full toss, but zeroing in on the top of off stump. Flogged into the covers, off the back foot
43.1
4
Starc to Santner, FOUR, that's a loose delivery, and excellently put away. Flipped off the hip, very fine through fine leg. No cutting that off

END OF OVER:
43 | 8 Runs 1 Wkt | NZ: 276/7 | RR: 6.41

  • Mitchell Santner0 (1b)
  • Adam Milne5 (3b)
  • Josh Hazlewood8-0-47-3
  • Pat Cummins9-0-67-1

Reuben : "Everyone comparing NZ today to BD yesterday, but let's wait and see if Australia can get off to start like England did (Post 3rd over)."

42.6
1lb
Hazlewood to Santner, 1 leg bye, on the pads, deflected to the leg side. Three to go
42.5
1
Hazlewood to Milne, 1 run, on the pads, whittled to backward square
42.4
0
Hazlewood to Milne, no run, good riposte, outside off stump and can't lay a bat on it
42.3
4
Hazlewood to Milne, FOUR, that's more like it! A bit of a loose half-volley, but put away with aplomb, inches to the right of short cover, inches to the left of mid-off
42.2
W
Hazlewood to Neesham, OUT, stand and deliver... deliver it straight to mid-on. Not the shot the circumstances required. New Zealand are sinking badly in the slog overs. They might struggle to use their full allocation at this rate

JDS Neesham c Warner b Hazlewood 6 (17m 10b 0x4 0x6) SR: 60.00

Gareth: "41.5 "spanged"? What is this word?" It's onomatopoeic, the sound a frying pan makes when it hits you flush in the face

42.1
2
Hazlewood to Neesham, 2 runs, wide of off stump, sliced to third man, where Starc slips as he jogs in to gather

Four overs to go. Who wants some?

END OF OVER:
42 | 8 Runs 1 Wkt | NZ: 268/6 | RR: 6.38

  • James Neesham4 (8b)
  • Mitchell Santner0 (0b)
  • Pat Cummins9-0-67-1
  • Josh Hazlewood7-0-40-2

Oliver Denny: "Anderson! Anderson! We want Anders... oh"

41.6
1
Cummins to Neesham, 1 run, on the back foot, tapped to short midwicket

TJ: "NZ have made similar selection mistakes to Bangladesh. Both have brilliant bowling depth but selected the wrong bowlers for the conditions. " Hear, hear. Justice for Jeets!

41.5
W
Cummins to Anderson, OUT, another ambitious wipe, but this time it's simply spanged high into the off side. Who wants it? No-one really, but Henriques is the closest at backward point, clinging onto a steepler inches from the turf as he just about judges it in time!

CJ Anderson c Henriques b Cummins 8 (8m 5b 0x4 1x6) SR: 160.00

41.4
6
Cummins to Anderson, SIX, short, pulled, top-edged, and gone! Clears the rope at backward square leg, that's what sheer pace can do sometimes
41.3
0
Cummins to Anderson, no run, well bowled, leaves Anderson on his backside as he limboes out of the way of a well-directed bouncer, kept following him from round the wicket

Kane's best

81

Previous highest score for Williamson in ODIs against Australia, which came in Canberra in December 2016.

Once again

527

Runs added by Williamson and Taylor as a pair in their last 4 ODI outings in England, including today. Their stands - 121, 206, 101, 99.

One to improve

35.11

Kane Williamson's average in ODIs against Aus, his second-lowest among full-member teams. In 11 innings, before today, he has scored only 2 fifties v Aus.

After a long time

36

No. of consecutive ODI inns without a fifty for Ronchi, before scoring one today. His last such score was 170* against SL in Dunedin in June 2015.

Good toss to lose?

1-4

Win-loss record of toss winning teams at Edgbaston in the last 5 completed ODIs. The only win was by India in the 2013 Champions Trophy final.

Australia's dominance

1999

Last time Aus lost to NZ in a neutral ODI, in the 1999 World Cup. Overall, Aus have a 17-1 win-loss record v NZ in 19 neutral ODIs.

ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut)

Group A
TeamMWLPTNRR
ENG33061.045
BAN31130
AUS3012-0.992
NZ3021-1.058
Group B
TeamMWLPTNRR
IND32141.37
PAK3214-0.68
SA31220.167
SL3122-0.798